Winning is possible but not easy. How on earth do you get
your bets onto the winning horse or greyhound with any
sort of consistency???
This is THE fundamental problem facing anyone who
intends to take betting seriously. Make no mistake;
there are people out there who are making a very
nice income from doing just that. How do they do it?
Obviously, studying the form, in all its detail, and
allowing for the weather and going, the jockey, the
trainer, the myriad factors that have a bearing, all
have their place. All of the horses in a race have to be
assessed in similar detail. But there is more to it than
that, isn't there. If not, the winners of non-handicaps
would be predictable with near certainty and all the
horses would pass the post together in handicaps!!!
So why can you not get it right most of the time? Why is
it that the great majority of favourites do not win?
Naturally there is more than one answer. Horses and
greyhounds are not machines and they do genuinely have
"off" days, whether for mental or physical reasons
("spooked" by the event, unexpected bug). They also have
accidents, specially in jumping. But it is not all
chance. If you have ever wondered if things get "fixed",
be in no doubt. They DO.
I am not suggesting illegality or immorality in this. It
is just part of the business (sport) that seems
essential for its survival.
Trainers must beat the handicapper in order to have a
chance of making ends meet. In other words, the animal
must go off at longer odds than would be justified if
the true form was known and the
trainer/stable/connections must get decent bets on.
Finding these instances is key to successfully getting
big-priced winners.